Is there such a thing as a good teacher compared to a bad teacher? I personally think there are teachers that are good at connecting information to their students lives. They are those teachers that act as a bridge to good knowledge for students. A 'bad' teacher can be defined as those teachers that teacher a subject, while those 'good' teachers teach students a subject.
How can curriculum and instruction be used as a vehicle?
- Important "We cannot teach the breadth of the entire world and at the same time achieve any depth of understanding" The world is expanding and is information.
- What we study is essential to the structure of the discipline
- What we study provides a roadmap toward expertise in a discipline
- how can we use it?
- What we study is essential to building student understanding
- Avoid "coverage" and look for "uncoverage" of information
- make it full of meaning and applicable to life.
- What we study balances knowledge, understanding, and skill
- curriculum can be a mile wide and only an inch deep, it won't provide real learning
- Focused "No more building sugar cube igloos without it connecting to essential knowledge."
- Whatever we do is unambiguously aligned with the articulated and essential learning goals
- Whatever we do is designed to get us where we need to go
- Both the teacher and students know why we doing what we're doing
- Both the teacher and students know bigger picture knowledge, understanding, and skill
- Engaging "Students need a feeling of accomplishment or satisfaction while enjoying their work."
- Students most often find meaning in their work
- Students most often find the work intriguing
- Students see themselves and their world in the work
- Students see value to others in the work
- Students find the work provokes their curiosity
- Students often find themselves absorbed by the work
- Demanding "We believe each person knows quite clearly what it means to do one's best, and that everyone, given a chance, would like to savor that experience as often as possible."
- The work is most often a bit beyond the reach of each learner
- Student growth is nonnegotiable
- no watering down information
- Standards for work and behavior are high
- Students are guided in working and thinking like professionals
- There is no "loose" time
- Scaffolded "Raise the celling of performance for each learner."
- The teacher teaches for success
- Criteria for success are clear to students
- Criteria for classroom operation and student behavior are clear to students
- Varied materials support growth of a range of learners
- Varied modes of teaching support a variety of learners
- Varied avenues to learning support a variety of learners
- Small and large group instruction focuses on varied learner needs
- Varied peer support mechanisms are consistently available
- The teacher uses modeling, organizers, and other strategies to point out success
- The opportunity to be shaped by rich, defensive curriculum ought to belong to every learner.
- Learners need to interact with curriculum in ways that work for them.
I just love how perfect your little "visual" additions to your posts are... throughout your entire blog! They show me, graphically, the depth of your understanding! (3 pts.)
ReplyDelete